Healthcare. Six workloads, one endpoint.
Providers, payers & health systems — the workloads below need more than one data model at once, which is exactly why they stall on a stitched stack.
Hospital networks, diagnostic chains, payers and TPAs across India and APAC running 3–7 EHRs with an active clinical-AI programme.
The forcing function.
Healthcare's constraint was never data volume — it is that a single patient is scattered across 3–7 EHRs and specialised stores stitched by fragile pipelines. Clinical AI must be explainable, source-transparent and human-in-the-loop; none of that is achievable when the evidence lives in a different system from the record.
The care graph — one patient scattered across 3–7 EHRs is reassembled as relationships between encounters, providers and claims.
of health systems have formal AI governance vs plan to deploy clinical AI within two years
per network — proprietary models, inconsistent coding, limited APIs
report high success with imaging AI despite ~90% deployment
Six workloads, five query shapes.
Almost no workload here needs only one data model — which is why single-model databases deliver it only with a second system and a sync problem.
Evidence-based retrieval for clinicians — hybrid search over guidelines, literature and the patient record, with every assertion traceable to its source.
Reduced care variability at the point of decision, with an auditable evidence chain.
Reconcile 3–7 EHRs into one queryable, FHIR-normalised view; graph relationships plus semantic search give every care team the full picture.
Fewer avoidable adverse events and readmissions at transitions of care.
Surface comparable priors via vector similarity over imaging and report embeddings, joined live with the structured clinical record.
Faster reporting turnaround and better-supported second reads.
Model payer–provider–member flows as a live graph to catch upcoding, leakage and prior-auth abuse invisible to siloed rule engines.
Leakage recovery and cleaner claims — directly margin-accretive.
Predict readmission and deterioration risk across cohorts — pattern search joined with structured history drives targeted, proactive intervention.
Better outcomes per rupee of care-management capacity deployed.
Every AI-assisted decision logged to a single source of truth — audit-ready, source-transparent trails for ABDM, DPDP, PDPA and APPI, answerable in plain language.
Governance that closes the gap between AI ambition and AI oversight.
Impact statements are directional targets referenced to published industry research — calibrate against your own baseline.
The stack this replaces in Healthcare.
Five licences, five sync jobs, five security perimeters — collapsed into one atomic store.
A patient assembled once, not per pilot — the prerequisite that keeps promising clinical AI from stalling before the bedside.